Question for HiG: If a player draws a Hill as the last tile is he allowed to place it without putting a tile under it? Or, does not having a tile under it bar him from placing the tile?(blue dog)
Quote from: Carcking on July 23, 2014, 09:45:24 AMQuestion for HiG: If a player draws a Hill as the last tile is he allowed to place it without putting a tile under it? Or, does not having a tile under it bar him from placing the tile?(blue dog)Excellent question. I second it! It actually happened the first time we played with the expansion, and I didn't even think of it as being a possible rules problem. lol
I can't think of a case where you could play it so that its tie-breaker power would be relevant.
I was thinking the Hill feature is impotent if it's on the last tile. I can't think of a case where you could play it so that its tie-breaker power would be relevant.
Quote from: Carcking on July 24, 2014, 11:54:13 AMI was thinking the Hill feature is impotent if it's on the last tile. I can't think of a case where you could play it so that its tie-breaker power would be relevant.It could be important to know if the tiebreaker applies if you are playing with The Count expansion?
It is an interesting question regardless of "the last tile" thing. Before that it wasn't important on which tile you "parachute" from CoC, but now the things are changed.Does the follower from CoC have the right to choose the tile to land to, that's the real question!
The other situation that it might matter is if you "flee from the plague" on to this tile. Though personally I think that is quite a broken game mechanic anyway when used with other expansions so I tend not to play it.
I'm also curious about this empty bag of tiles that whaleyland mentioned. How is it a bag of tiles if the bag is empty? We may never know.
Started by Carcking
Started by Whaleyland
Started by mPony
Started by vdtricky
Started by DrManhattan