Little buildings - question

[Windekind]

A question about the 'little buildings':
Does it play a role where the 'small building' is on a land tile?
For example, in the first example, the house is behind the road. Does the yellow meeple also receive points like in example 2?
In the third example, the yellow team also receives points? Or is the small building too far?



Does the yellow meeple also receive points from the tower?


Linkback: https://www.carcassonnecentral.com/community/index.php?topic=4440.0

[DrMeeple]

The building only afects ALL the tile where it is!! Then, in the first photo, exemple 1 and 2 are the same. But the third the building are in other tile that the city. The same with the second photo. The tower is in other tile that the city and It doesn't produce any effect.
You can use the website wikicarpedia. Is very useful and you will find all the Q&A.

Enviado desde mi XT1700 mediante Tapatalk

[Meepledrone]

Hi Windekind!

DrMeeple is right. The Little Building provides bonus points to all the features participated by the tile it is on: roads, cities, monasteries, fields,...

Those points are added after all other modifiers, so they are not affected by the inn or the witch... 

As DrMeeple recommends... You can find on this WICA (WikiCarpedia) page the annotated rules:

http://wikicarpedia.com/index.php/Little_Buildings_(1st_edition)

You need more info? Check the Scoring Reference Pages here, where you can select the expansions involved to see how the scoring is computed for all the features 

http://wikicarpedia.com/index.php/Main_Page#Reference_Guides_2

Cheers!

[Windekind]

But for farmers, the meadows are important, not the tile where it stands?
Is this correct?

In this example the yellow meeple would get the tower, but not the shed?


So if a river is used and a project that is finished on a river tile. Gets the meeple points even though the little building is on the other side of the water. But not the farmer.

[Meepledrone]

But for farmers, the meadows are important, not the tile where it stands?
Is this correct?

Farmers are "locked" to a meadow, but Little Buildings will affect all features present on the tile. This is the ambivalence normally present in Little Buildings: you are helping yourself and possibly others, so you have to think carefully where you want to place them.

In this example the yellow meeple would get the tower, but not the shed?

The yellow farmer would benefit from both the tower and the shed. The Litte Buildings do not restrict their effect to a feature. The tower could be placed on the city segment and it will equally affect the adjacent field present on the tile, for example.

So if a river is used and a project that is finished on a river tile. Gets the meeple points even though the little building is on the other side of the water. But not the farmer.

The Little Building will affect all features on a tile event if it a river tile. For example, a Little Building on this tile would affect the city, the 4 meadows (fields) on both sides of the river and the road not matter where the Little Building is placed on the tile.

[DrMeeple]

Meepledrone is right. You must to apply this rule: the building affects ALL the tile where It is. if you understand this you don't need anymore.

Enviado desde mi XT1700 mediante Tapatalk