I wonder why this isn't addressed in the rules?
However, can a green field be matched to a green field if there are no monasteries on them?
•The new tile (with red borders in the examples) must be placed with at least one edge abutting one previously placed tile. The new tile may not simply be placed corner to corner with a previous tile.•The new tile must be placed so that all field, city, and road segments on the new tile continue to field, city, androad segments on all abutting tiles.
Quote from: dsegel on February 02, 2017, 08:18:46 AMI wonder why this isn't addressed in the rules?Because the new rules main goal was to introduce a "cute baby language" rather then leave the rules as coherent, as they had been before. In the original rules there was a general paragraph:Quote•The new tile (with red borders in the examples) must be placed with at least one edge abutting one previously placed tile. The new tile may not simply be placed corner to corner with a previous tile.•The new tile must be placed so that all field, city, and road segments on the new tile continue to field, city, androad segments on all abutting tiles."At least one edge" means generally any type of edge can be connected, as long as it fits to the edge of the previouse tile. This, I believe, was better clarified then the case-by-case explanation done in the new edition, but it was not as easy to dumb down with encouraging filler statements like "Huzzah! There is one because both ends of the road are closed", "you score 3 points. Well done!" or "Sadly, all good things must come to an end, and the same goes for a game of Carcassonne. You may wish that it were otherwise, but there must be a winner!" So to summ it up, the new rules are a mess. Better to look out for a pdf of the old rules, which can be find here and use the new ones only for reference regarding Abbot and Gardens.
Started by Hylian87
Started by jvnoledawg
Started by SRBO
Started by Scott
Started by Hounk