The two images you uploaded are huge.However, something weird is happening with images. I just uploaded one and the Forum is displaying it full size instead of a thumbnail you can click and magnify.
Quote from: Meepledrone on July 08, 2019, 02:22:23 PMThe two images you uploaded are huge.However, something weird is happening with images. I just uploaded one and the Forum is displaying it full size instead of a thumbnail you can click and magnify.I noticed that last night, too, when I uploaded the sample Cliffs tile ...
Hello Meepledrone!I'm not still familiarized with "quote" action, though my smartphone, it's difficult seeing from it. Sorry. I'm going to talk from "recently" memory.
[quote]Blah blah blah [/quote]
[quote author=Carca_Maker link=topic=4332.msg63629#msg63629 date=1562694391]Hello Meepledrone!I'm not still familiarized with "quote" action, though my smartphone, it's difficult seeing from it. Sorry. I'm going to talk from "recently" memory. [/quote]My comments... before repeating the header and continuing with the quoted post[quote author=Carca_Maker link=topic=4332.msg63629#msg63629 date=1562694391]That's a good idea to identify the four kinds of elements with A, B, C, D.....[/quote]
That's a good idea to identify the four kinds of elements with A, B, C, D.
I can say that your two calculations, look like, seem to "unify" some cases belonging to a "upper", category of cases. "120“ cases, and "210“ approximately in the other hand, it seems to me a nice approximation to the goal, because it's not a huge amount of rather cases. But I don't still know what does it means, so brief numbers. Now, the question is how to FIT your first calculation, to the most simple cases, that I know and I calculated too: the PAIRS of elements. (And the trivial singles cases too in one table).
I would be glad if your mathematical model can get to, describe the same as my table of pairs. This is, how many cells are belonging to each pair, etc?. That's the question that I need for first approximation, for every trees and its branches.Posdata: The cells of this pairs table are empty, because are an example.Thanks.
Good evening, Meepledrone! First of all, I wish to give you a "+1" merit, no doubt, you are a math sage!. Afterwards I will have to read better what you wrote, but in a first approximation I think that "90" cases for pairs, "720" for triplets , etc is the right way.
And written in the right way, I add : "Case #1: Elements in different order represent different sets", in the Meepledrone terms.
Started by Xscone
Started by Carcassonne0123
Started by dirk2112
Started by Maurice Poucave
Started by Liambass