Yes... This is our only way to deal with the issue. Whatever the response is regarding the abbot, we will have to extrapolate for the other expansions. And nailing down the scoring events in the turn sequence is the corner stone to see how to appraoch the whole issue.So we are allowed to ask about:- Interactions between expansions within a Big Box- Interaction between major expansions- Clarifications about the rules of any expansion (major or minor) We cannot ask about interactions with minor expansions... unless they feel magnanimous and provide a hint.
Here you can find some info on key people at HiG... https://www.hans-im-glueck.de/en/verlag/mitarbeiter.htmlWe have been talking to Johannes and Freddy on Discord.
http://www.carcassonnecentral.com/community/index.php?topic=1609.msg20881#msg20881About acrobats: "Instead of placing a meeple or any other figure during 2. Placing a meeple, you can score a completed pyramid." From this sentence you can understand that acrobats are scored in step 2, even if this sentence is placed in "3. Scoring a feature" section."You trigger it in Step 2, but still get the points in step 3". --2021
I think that shepherd scoring still occurs in 2C. Johannes only said that the shepherd scoring is considered if you want to send a meeple in Carcassonne. So, if you want to send a meeple in Carcassonne, you consider all points received in 1C-3C.
Quote from: Carcassonne93 on February 01, 2021, 05:57:58 AMI think that shepherd scoring still occurs in 2C. Johannes only said that the shepherd scoring is considered if you want to send a meeple in Carcassonne. So, if you want to send a meeple in Carcassonne, you consider all points received in 1C-3C.I'll be Devil's Advocate hare. But I think that intention of Message is to give bonus not for players which scores but player which finished feature.Their interpretation is that scoring message is defined in step 3. Scoring a Feature - so it's only for scoring here.Simplifying of all steps only to 4 divisions are mayme not so usefull for us (players), but usefull for them (HiG)
I want to find out Klaus-Jürgen Wrede's (the creator of Base Game and more), kettlefish's (who presented on CarcassonneCentral a lot of official clarifications from Georg Wild) and Georg Wild's (whose previous official clarifications on this topic are now contradicted by Johannes) opinions about these clarifications (although probably is "nearly impossible").
Started by Bumsakalaka
Started by egamar
Started by kettlefish
Started by CarcAddict