Whenever the player places a tile that extends the road or city which includes their builder, they may take a double turn.
I would say yes too, but that's a guess. I think that the second turn should be confirmed as soon as you place a tile that extends your city/road with a builder. If your builder is removed after tile placement, then you should still get your second turn.
I have to say I disagree. The builder effect is at the end of the turn. Therefore after the Dragon. In my opinion.
At what time do we make the judgment about whether the road or city "includes" the builder? Immediately upon placing the tile or after the "Resolve Move the Wood" phase? Or some other time?
The relevant line of the CAR, as folks have noted, is: Whenever the player places a tile that extends the road or city which includes their builder, they may take a double turn.
Might this be worth seeking an official clarification?
What if you didn't complete it and don't score it? Do you then have to determine how long the Builder should stay there before you earn the extended turn?In your example DL, all the conditions had been met in order for you to earn the extended turn. No reason to make it any more complicated.
...The same situation would occur if (and I don't know why anyone would ever do this), someone placed a princess tile in the city and took their only follower out, thus requiring the builder to come out as well. Should they still get a second turn then, too?
Started by Decar
Started by MrNumbers
Started by Carcassonne0123
Started by PapaGeek
Started by lucash1891