Hi!
My friend and I have a disagreement concerning the completion of a city (or road) with a builder already on it.
Here I will try to illustrate the problem:
Turn 1a:
A player completes a city with a builder on it, and the builder (and followers) goes back to the supply. - So far, so good.
Turn 1b:
The player then places her second tile (with a city on it) extending an already existing city with NO followers on it. She then places her follower on the tile (city). Now she says she can place the builder on the same tile, in the same turn!
The rule she is defending this move with is:
"The player can deploy a follower to the second tile as well as to the first. If the road or city is completed by the placement of the first tile, then the player may deploy the newly-returned builder to the second tile."
Is this a legal move?
Linkback: https://www.carcassonnecentral.com/community/index.php?topic=2685.0