Carcassonne Central

Carc Central Community => Reviews & Session Reports => Topic started by: wolnic on January 02, 2018, 02:00:18 PM

Title: Fan Expansion - Stained Glass
Post by: wolnic on January 02, 2018, 02:00:18 PM
Had a look on both this site, and the archived site content, but can find nothing describing whether this is a workable expansion. Anyone tried it, before I go and print the tiles? Thanks.
Title: Re: Fan Expansion - Stained Glass
Post by: Leven on January 03, 2018, 03:31:16 AM
Not yet but sounds interesting.
If you're hesitating then maybe you could try it without printing the parts of the stained glass pictures that belong to this expansion. Just take (cut) 24 small pieces of paper, and write two numbers onto one side indicating the position (column and row) of the piece.
Title: Re: Fan Expansion - Stained Glass
Post by: wolnic on January 03, 2018, 10:21:52 AM
After a bit more digging I found the Stained Glass discussion thread (http://carcassonnecentral.com/forum/index.php?topic=1700.0) under Completed Expansions on the Archived site - I'd been looking only at the Expansion Workshop thread. And I'd only searched the current site, not the archived one!

It's also an expansion that is version independant (no tiles), so could be used by those using the new art.

I'm probably going to print the images and mount on thick card, rather than on Carc tiles, and am thinking of making minor adjustments to rules (such as allowing an exchange, rather than the steal) as our games are usually 2-player minimal conflict.
Title: Re: Fan Expansion - Stained Glass
Post by: Sinscerly on January 03, 2018, 12:10:01 PM
Wolnic, your link isnt working for me  :(
Title: Re: Fan Expansion - Stained Glass
Post by: Leven on January 03, 2018, 01:06:20 PM
Try this one:
Stained Glass discussion thread (http://carcassonnecentral.com/forum/index.php?topic=1700.0)
Title: Re: Fan Expansion - Stained Glass
Post by: wolnic on January 03, 2018, 01:27:15 PM
Thanks, Leven. I hadn't noticed the extra bits of code when I copied/pasted/created the link. Now corrected in original post.