Author Topic: Carcassonne Dream Teams (Read 40675 times)

quevy · « **Reply #120 on:** March 07, 2016, 08:50:27 AM »

I think Wednesday night may be fine, but I'm not 100% sure until a few hours before.

Decar · « **Reply #121 on:** March 07, 2016, 08:54:10 AM »

Wednesday isn't great for me this week, unless it's late ~10pm

quevy · « **Reply #122 on:** March 07, 2016, 08:56:43 AM »

Your 22 are for me the 23, I think it is too late.

Decar · « **Reply #123 on:** March 07, 2016, 09:00:20 AM »

I teach a class on Wednesday nights, so it's always hard. Friday is clear but I know jungleboy can't do this weekend. Tomorrow I'm playing DnP.

How's nextweek looking? Tuesdays and Fridays are always clear for me + weekends.

jungleboy · « **Reply #124 on:** March 07, 2016, 09:03:36 AM »

OK, it might have to be next week then.

jma03 · « **Reply #125 on:** May 02, 2016, 05:38:33 AM »

Someone available in this competition to organize a game???

(The glomming knights)

khalidqasrawi · « **Reply #126 on:** June 09, 2016, 03:08:16 PM »

The Road Runners 241 : Goldfishes 231

We had a rare thing today in this league: a match. First tile drawn was a cathedral by Rich_The_Fish which was promptly attacked by Imelda. A big city soon formed which looked to be in stalemate but for the split CCCF tile that gave Goldfishes two cities instead. The middle game had a battle for the big middle city which I won but was finished by Goldfishes for the trade points. Roadrunners shared a smaller city and I won the second cathedral city. With 40 tiles to go, Road Runners had a good lead. The last battle was for the farm on the right. Imelda put all her eggs (meeples) into that and scored 40 for it. Halfling had an early and strong lead for the trade points and was reluctant to share any of them. Fun game. Thanks to all for finding the time to play. Looking forward to the next!

Decar · « **Reply #127 on:** June 10, 2016, 12:55:15 AM »

Looks like a very close game! Not sure if anyone's asked this question but are trade goods shared by the team instead of the individual? It's possible for 2 players to have the majority when combined etc.