can we imagine making a petition to HIG? I'm serious! we could also involve the German forum ...
Quote from: danisthirty on November 19, 2018, 04:04:04 AMQuote from: dronedrone on November 18, 2018, 01:49:53 PMQuoteI think that's correct. At least I understand rules like you... I find it fascinating that, what appears to be a simple concept, has so many nuances ...I think this is the trouble for HiG with a game that has so many expansions now. Clarifying all the interactions between expansions without breaking what's already known becomes almost impossible, hence their disclaimer that we've seen on a few of the more recent expansions explaining that that expansion is designed to be played with the basic game only and any other expansions included are played "at your own risk"! can we imagine making a petition to HIG? I'm serious! we could also involve the German forum ...
Quote from: dronedrone on November 18, 2018, 01:49:53 PMQuoteI think that's correct. At least I understand rules like you... I find it fascinating that, what appears to be a simple concept, has so many nuances ...I think this is the trouble for HiG with a game that has so many expansions now. Clarifying all the interactions between expansions without breaking what's already known becomes almost impossible, hence their disclaimer that we've seen on a few of the more recent expansions explaining that that expansion is designed to be played with the basic game only and any other expansions included are played "at your own risk"!
QuoteI think that's correct. At least I understand rules like you... I find it fascinating that, what appears to be a simple concept, has so many nuances ...
I think that's correct. At least I understand rules like you
I agree! It would be very complicated but could worth it.
it's been months since I've asked Kettle to talk to Hig about the clarifications. aApparently, at least so it seems from the results of the last fanmeeting, Kettle and Hig have spent 3 hours talking about it ... so I imagine that a bit of collaboration on their part there was! But Kettle disappeared. I also tried to write them but he never replied to me ... Anyway, the problem remains: many questions without answers. I have the italian Carcopedia to update and you others the wiki page (and I apologize for my lack of participation in the project, but it would mean to translate everything again and I do not have enough time). So... What do we do? we dedicate a paragraph to each expansion calling it "unofficial interactions but that should be corrected because elaborated by forum users"?I have no problem with this, but if we do so we have to create a new chapter in the forum and work on it.
It just dawned on me that an alternative to striking is to find another drug dealer and instigate a turf war between the two rival gangs.
I, and I believe many players, love when things are written and regulated: I do not speak only of Carcassonne: how many times, when we play any game, there is a situation where we are forced to say: "ok, this thing is not written by no part! what do we do? do we do in this way or do it in another way? "... Then, in a future game, the same situation happens and we say:" ah, this thing has already happened to us! I do not remember ... we could do it like this or so... no, it was not like that! Oh well, then let's pretend this time that... ".For me, the frustration lies in not having everything clear, not in having to necessarily ask for clarification.
Started by Hylian87
Started by kettlefish
Started by Allograft
Started by Christianmocking